Given the limitations of BGs, businesses should explore powerful alternatives that are often more efficient and strategic.
Surety Bonds: The Specialist Alternative
A Surety Bond is a three-party agreement:
- Principal: The party obligated to perform (e.g., a contractor).
- Obligee: The party who receives the guarantee (e.g., a project owner).
- Surety: An insurance company (like Allianz Trade) that guarantees to the Obligee that the Principal will perform its obligations.
Bank Guarantee vs. Surety Bond: While they often cover the same needs (Performance, Bid, Advance Payment), Surety Bonds offer crucial advantages:
- Capital Efficiency: Surety Bonds do not require 100% collateral. They are underwritten based on the Principal's financial strength and track record, freeing up cash and bank credit lines for operational use.
- Specialist Expertise: Sureties possess deep industry knowledge (especially in construction and services) and conduct their own rigorous underwriting, which can provide an additional layer of project vetting.
- Claims Handling: Sureties typically investigate claims to validate them, protecting the Principal from unfair or premature calls on the guarantee.
For performance-related obligations, a Surety Bond is often a more strategic and financially sound choice than a Bank Guarantee.
Trade Credit Insurance (TCI): Portfolio Payment Protection
TCI operates differently. Instead of securing a single transaction or performance obligation, Trade Credit Insurance protects a company's entire portfolio of accounts receivable from the risk of non-payment due to customer bankruptcy or protracted default. It is the ideal tool for businesses engaged in ongoing trade with multiple customers on open account terms.