Big companies in emerging markets and SMEs in Europe tighten the noose on their suppliers and inventories

Big companies in emerging markets and SMEs in Europe tighten the noose on their suppliers and inventories

July 11 2019
  • At a global level, the Working Capital Requirement (WCR) of large companies - a measure of financial resources that companies consume to cover operating costs and expenses, and run their businesses efficiently – has deteriorated by +1 to 70 days in 2018, back to the highest (worst) level since 2012. In value terms, this represents a +12% rise i.e. +USD820bn of additional financial resources were consumed by working capital in 2018 - instead of supporting new product development, modernization, geographical expansion, acquisitions or debt reduction. For 2019, we expect a correction in inventories and a stronger discipline in payment in reaction to lower global growth and higher global uncertainty: this would support a decline in large companies’ WCR (-2 to 68 days).
  • Most increases in large companies’ WCR were recorded in emerging markets, notably Brazil (+9 days), South Africa (+8) and Russia (+2), - with China as the main exception and the surge in inventories as the key reason. This was accompanied by a strong increase in debt at end 2018: +1pp of GDP in emerging markets in Q4 2018 from the previous quarter. However, advanced economies were not immune, notably the U.S. (+1) and within Europe (+4 days for the Nordics on average, +3 in Germany and Spain). However, several other advanced economies stabilized or decreased their large companies’ WCR through a decrease in Days Sales Outstanding (Japan, the UK) or an increase in Days Payable Outstanding (Italy, France, Portugal). At a global level, the rise in WCR was concentrated in six sectors: agrifood, automotive, household equipment, paper, utilities and business services.
  • Looking at Western Europe, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs[1]) posted better performance in WCR than large companies in 2018. In Italy, SMEs reduced their WCR by -14 days (compared to -4 days for large companies). In Spain, SMEs recorded a -7 days decrease in WCR, while large companies posted a +3 days rebound. WCR slightly improved for French SMEs (-1 day), though it remained stable for large companies. In Germany, WCR for SMEs increased by 2 days and by 3 days for large companies. The highest increases in WCR were registered mainly in sectors which are dependent on external trade (in Germany: electronics, transport equipment, machinery and equipment, paper and agrifood; in France: electronics, textiles, pharmaceuticals and automotive suppliers).
  • However, overall SMEs’ WRC remains one month longer compared to large companies. This is notably visible in Southern European countries, with a spread of 37 days and 22 days in Italy and Spain, respectively, against 23 in Germany and 15 in France. In those four countries, six sectors experienced higher than average WCR for their SMEs (105 days in Italy, 89 in Germany, 81 in France and Spain): textiles, transport equipment, machinery, metals, and, to a lower extent, chemicals and electronics.

 

Global WCR of large companies increased by +USD820bn in 2018

At a global level, the Working Capital Requirement (WCR) of large companies deteriorated by +1 day to 70 days in 2018, coming back to its highest (worst) level since 2012 and pointing to a lower operating cash flow, higher (debt) capital needs and lower profitability of companies. This rise in WCR mainly comes from inventories, which recorded an unusual accumulation (+3 days to 52 days in 2018), reaching a record high over the last 10 years. In the same period, large companies adjusted their payment behaviors by raising supplier terms of payment (DPO increased by +1 day to 47 days) and decreasing customer terms of payment (DSO declined by -1 day to 65 days), a double sign of “self-discipline”, alongside a weakening and uncertain economic outlook. Yet, those adjustments were insufficient to fully offset the accumulation of inventories. While their combined turnover rose by +10% in USD terms, large companies’ WCR reached USD7.8tn, which represents a +12% increase, i.e. +USD820bn of additional financial resources were consumed by working capital in 2018,  instead of supporting major objectives such as new product development, modernization, geographical expansion, acquisitions or debt reduction.
For 2019, we expect a correction in inventories both in real terms (volume) and in book value (depreciation), as well as still stronger discipline in payment in reaction to lower global growth and higher global uncertainty, notably on the DSO side (-1 day). This would support a decline in large companies’ WCR by -2 days to 68 in 2019, leading to a stabilization of their combined WCR in value terms (at USD7.8bn) due to the expected increase in global turnover (+3% in USD terms).

Figure 1: Large companies’ WCR in number of days and USDbn (left chart) and yearly change (right chart)
Figure 1: Large companies’ WCR in number of days and USDbn (left chart) and yearly change (right chart)
Sources: Bloomberg, Euler Hermes, Allianz Research
Figure 2: Changes in large companies’ WCR and sub-components, in number of days
Figure 2: Changes in large companies’ WCR and sub-components, in number of days
Sources: Eurostat, Allianz Research
Figure 3: Large companies’ WCR – Summary Heat map by countries and sectors 
Figure 3: Large companies’ WCR – Summary Heat map by countries and sectors
Sources: Bloomberg, Euler Hermes, Allianz Research

Emerging markets posted the most severe rise in large companies’ WCR

Large companies’ WCR rose in three out of five countries in 2018, each time with a noticeable inventory accumulation (+3 days on average) as the key trigger for the increase in WCR - except for three export-driven countries: the Netherlands, South Korea and Hong Kong.

Emerging markets recorded the top increases in WCR, especially in Latam (+9 days in Brazil, +5 in Chile) and Africa/Middle East (+8 in South Africa, +3 in Morocco). There were also noticeable deteriorations in Central and Eastern Europe (+2 in Russia, +3 in Bulgaria) and in Asia (+2 in India, +1 in both South Korea and Hong Kong). In terms of regional averages, this represents significant increases in Latam (+7days) and Africa/Middle East (+5), but a more limited rise in Asia (+1). In this context, China is the main exception with a stabilized WCR, but the latter, along with Saudi Arabia (116 days), still exhibits the largest WCR (94 days) in the world. Globally, the highest WCR are also observed in emerging markets (i.e. Brazil, India, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Russia, Romania, Bulgaria). In 2018, the rise in WCR in emerging markets was accompanied by a strong increase in debt at end- 2018: +1pp of GDP to 96% in Q4 2018 compared to the previous quarter.

Several advanced economies also registered an increase in large companies’ WCR: the Nordics (+4 days in average), Greece (+4), Germany (+3), the Netherlands (+3), Spain (+3), Australia (+2) and the US (+1). Yet, , all of them maintained WCR levels below the global average (70 days). Importantly, they proved to be more efficient than emerging markets in adjusting their payment behavior to limit the negative impact of the rise in inventories. De facto, the increase in WCR is due to a significant surge in inventories in the Nordics (+6 days on average), Germany (+4), Spain (+3), Australia (+3) and the US (+1).But payment behaviors most often had a favorable impact, with a decrease in the spread between DSO and DPO (-3 days in Sweden, -2 days in the other Nordics and -1 day in Germany). The Netherlands, where the rise in WCR comes only from a lengthening in payment behavior on both the DSO and DPO sides, is an exception.

Conversely, in two out of five countries, large companies succeeded in stabilizing and even decreasing their WCR despite the rise in inventories (+1 day in average). This performance was registered most often in advanced economies, with a noticeable decrease in the WCR in European countries like Portugal (-6 days), Italy (-4), Switzerland (-4), Belgium (-3), the UK (-1) and Canada (-3). The key trigger was a decrease in their DSO, but three countries in Europe stand out with a large increase in DPO – Portugal (+8 days), Italy (+7) and France (+5).

Figure 4: Changes in WCR and sub-components
Figure 4: Changes in WCR and sub-components
Sources: Bloomberg, Euler Hermes, Allianz Research
Figure 5: Large companies’ WCR by country (2018 level and change versus 2017) 
Figure 5: Large companies’ WCR by country (2018 level and change versus 2017)
Sources: Bloomberg, Euler Hermes, Allianz Research

The rise in large companies’ WCR is concentrated in six sectors: agrifood, automotive, household equipment, paper, utilities and business services

For large companies, the rise in global WCR is much less widespread in terms of sectors than in terms of countries. One reason is that ”only” half of them suffered from a surge in inventories in 2018. This has been the case in particular for consumer-related sectors like retail (+4), automotive (+2), food (+2) and household goods (which posted a strong upside correction from its ”abnormal” drop in 2017), as well as for industry-related sectors like paper (+5), chemicals and telecom (+3 for both).This reveals the challenges of supply to adapt to a lower than expected level of demand.
The second reason is that all sectors reduced the spread between DSO and DPO - excepting the transportation and household equipment sectors. Noticeable drops in the DSO-DPO spread (i.e. by -4 days in retail, -3 days in telecom) enabled several sectors to compensate for the rising inventories.
De facto, and unlike last year, large companies succeeded in stabilizing or even decreasing their WCR in the majority of sectors (13 out of 20). This is especially the case for the top five sectors experiencing the highest level of WCR:  aeronautics (138 days in 2018), machinery (107), electronics (106), pharmaceuticals (104) and leisure goods (101).
In contrast, six sectors stand out with a major deterioration in WCR, each time in relation to an increase in inventories and a limited net adjustment in payment behavior. These are paper (+5 days in WCR to 80), agrifood (+2 to 71) and automotive (+1 to 84), along with utilities, business services and household equipment.

Figure 6: Change in DIO and DSO-DPO by sector (2018 versus 2017)
Figure 6: Change in DIO and DSO-DPO by sector (2018 versus 2017)
Sources: Bloomberg, Euler Hermes, Allianz Research
Figure 7: WCR by sector (2018 level and change versus 2017)
Figure 7: WCR by sector (2018 level and change versus 2017)
Sources: Bloomberg, Euler Hermes, Allianz Research

WCR is one month longer for European SMEs compared to large companies

Looking at Western Europe, SMEs posted better performance in WCR than large companies in 2018. In Italy, SMEs reduced their WCR by -14 days (compared to -4 days for large companies). In Spain, SMEs recorded a -7 days decrease in WCR while large companies posted a +3 days rebound. WCR slightly improved for French SMEs (-1 day) while it remained stable for large companies. In Germany, WCR for SMEs increased by 2 days and by 3 days for large companies.

However, overall SMEs’ WCR remains one month longer compared to large companies. This is notably visible in Southern European countries, with a spread of 37 days and 22 days respectively in Italy and Spain, against 23 in Germany and 15 in France. In those four countries, six sectors experienced higher than average WCR for their SMEs (105 days in Italy, 89 in Germany, 81 in France and Spain): textiles, transport equipment, machinery, metals, and, to a lower extent, chemicals and electronics. In terms of variation, the highest increases in WCR were registered mainly in sectors which are dependent on external trade (in Germany: electronics, transport equipment, machinery and equipment, paper and agrifood; in France: electronics, textiles, pharmaceuticals and automotive suppliers).

Figure 8 – SME WCR by sector, level vs variation
Figure 8 – SME WCR by sector, level vs variation
Sources: TRIBRating, Allianz Research
Head of Sector and Insolvency Research
maxime.lemerle@eulerhermes.com
Head of Macroeconomic Research
ana.boata@eulerhermes.com
Director, Credit Risk, at Euler Hermes Rating