A (fictitious) example:
A technical installation company operating both inside and outside the Benelux is implicated in a fraud scandal involving a foreign subsidiary. As part of a major construction project in Eastern Europe, orders were falsified (by its own employees and external suppliers working in concert) and false financial reports were submitted. This gives the impression that everything is going well. In reality, the progress of the project is a tragedy. Those involved have tried to conceal this reality by submitting false reports in the hope that things will gradually improve.
This fraud case seriously damaged the installation company. Investors, banks and customers pulled out, leading to major financial problems. Ultimately, the case led to the company's bankruptcy.
It is clear that the company's internal controls failed, even though the fraud was strongly linked to external parties such as contractors, suppliers and financial partners who put pressure on the subsidiary's management to provide false data.
How can this situation be avoided?
Annual fraud survey
Every year, Allianz Trade carries out a fraud survey in the Netherlands and Belgium. It highlights the different forms of fraud, the damage suffered by companies and the measures taken. Taken together, this gives a picture of the resistance and vulnerability of companies.
In particular, the survey shows that a large majority (57%) of companies faced with fraud do not report it to the police. It also shows that a third of all cases of fraud in the Netherlands are dealt with internally (no external experts are called in). Many companies prefer to keep fraud 'in-house' to avoid negative attention.